The WEF and WHO intent is brazen. See it Clearly or Live to Regret It.
You can't debate a rabid dog.
The strategem of hiding in plain sight has worked well up to now for both these disgusting, criminal organisations. One of the astonishing entries in Wikipedia, which has become a byword of pharma-corrupt and globalist propaganda, is the entry for Klaus Schwab, which deflects by the clever device of mentioning criticism which hardly scrapes the surface of what this man and his organisation is about. “Too much influence” is as great a euphemism as one could wish for the encouragement of sedition and mass “depopulation”.
Democracy gave this scum on the surface of the money pond a bloody nose in 2016. And so now the gloves are off.
“Salary level and lack of financial transparency
While Schwab declared that excessively high management salaries were "no longer socially acceptable",[36] his own annual salary of about one million Swiss Francs has been repeatedly questioned by the media. The Swiss radio and television corporation SRF mentioned this salary level in the context of ongoing public contributions to the WEF and the fact that the Forum does not pay any federal taxes.[37] Moreover, the former Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung journalist Jürgen Dunsch made the criticism that the WEF's financial reports were not very transparent since neither income nor expenditure were broken down.[38] Schwab has also drawn ire for mixing the finances of the not-for-profit WEF and other for-profit business ventures. For example, the WEF awarded a multimillion dollar contract to USWeb in 1998. Yet shortly after the deal went through, Mr. Schwab took a board seat at the same company, reaping valuable stock options.[39][40]
In the view of some critics the WEF is exercising too much influence on global systems and institutions. The picture shows George Soros during a Davos session on redesigning the international monetary system.
Capture of democratic structures and institutions
Schwab as publisher of the World Economic Forum's 2010 "Global Redesign" report postulates that a globalized world is best managed by a self-selected coalition of multinational corporations, governments (including through the UN system), and select civil society organizations (CSOs).[41] He argues that governments are no longer "the overwhelmingly dominant actors on the world stage" and that "the time has come for a new stakeholder paradigm of international governance". The WEF's vision includes a "public-private" UN, in which certain specialized agencies would operate under joint state and non-state governance systems.[42]
According to the Transnational Institute (TNI), the Forum is hence planning to replace a recognised democratic model with a model where a self-selected group of "stakeholders" make decisions on behalf of the people.[43] The think tank summarises that we are increasingly entering a world where gatherings such as Davos are "a silent global coup d'état" to capture governance.[43]
In a 2017 interview, Schwab said that Russian President Vladimir Putin had been recognized as a Young Global Leader, and also mentioned Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau: "I have to say, when I mention now names, like Mrs. (Angela) Merkel and even Vladimir Putin, and so on, they all have been Young Global Leaders of the World Economic Forum. But what we are very proud of now is the young generation like Prime Minister [Justin] Trudeau ... We penetrate the cabinet. So yesterday I was at a reception for Prime Minister Trudeau and I know that half of his cabinet, or even more than half of his cabinet, are actually Young Global Leaders."[44]” "
That brazen-ness is very much to the fore in the publication of quite a number of speeches and discussions that are part of the 2022 Fortress Davos. You can regale yourself with half an hour of discussion on Rumble between Albert Bourla, CEO of the serial felon corporation Pfizer, and Schwab or, if your stomach can stand it, Messrs Schwab and Gates desecrating right living in tandem.
Let them pontificate while they may. We will not debate these people, but we will put them in the dock soon, whatever that may take.
